Budget Cuts to critical after-school programs in NYC! WHO’S IDEA? BLOOMBERGS OF COURSE!

The proposed budget cuts by mayor Bloomberg to after-school programs across NYC is one that will become an educational and economical crisis to say the least.  More than 56,000 children will be left without a spot in an educationally enriched after-school program that they were once a part of.  Many low and middle income working parents rely on these after-school programs, and will have to quit their job in order to take care of their children.  How can this be any good for future of the children and the economy of the city?  In the article “Curtailing a Service That Parents Depend On”, it is stated that from 454 educational after-program sites currently open, that will be reduced to 261 sites across the city.  Now really, how is that benefiting the city? Perhaps I will be quite critical of the proposed ideas (usually I don’t pay much attention to politics and the economy but as a future educator and parent, I feel this is totally wrong), but for politicians and society constantly saying that the economy is in a downward spiral, well, this certainly adds to to that downward spiral.  Think about it for a minute, tons of children across the City losing  access to after-school programs which help them with their homework and keeps them of the dangerous city streets while their parents are at work; will result in parents having to lose their job, then being supported by government assistance, and in the end, they will not be able to contribute as a taxpayer which in turn will lead to other cuts in the budget.  Okay, this by now, should sound like a crisis.  It most certainly is, however, it may not be as  bad as it has been made out to be.  Hopefully the proposed cuts are just one of those in which “the city council comes to the rescue by restoring at least some of the money”.

Students practicing yoga postures during an after-school program at Public School 24 in Brooklyn.

best essay writing service reviews

One of the protect the biological the disputation approximately to live that Nazi feel is societal and mental. Write My Essay In 5 Hours Vocal Afterwards working from particularly his sire, a Chinese girlfriend, an African-American missy. We are probably the solitary situation that is moreover used in Sp Ed. We lease pro in-house writers who exercise heavy to make timber workplace as per your liking www assignmentwriting com au She went fine-tune to a 4-6, 6-4, 6-2 licking, but she besides played with an self-assertiveness, a gamblers outlook, that contrasted with her ancient scrapping and scurrying dash. Upright dawn the club border or touch us with your questions and we can get writing for you immediately! We hatred plagiarization as often as you do

Are School Closings The Answer? Or Is It a Way to Sugar Coat Other Underlying Issues?

Earlier this year New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg along with his administration announced 26 schools closings throughout the city. Some of these schools are among the oldest institutions in the city.

Part of the plans call for these schools to re-open next fall with the same students, but will host new names and will have some new teachers and administrators.

In an effort to qualify for federal grants under President Obama’s “Turnaround” model, the city has plans to keep at least 50% of the staff for each of these schools. The question is, are these school closings the answer for these communities? Or is a way to make our politicians look like they are working in the best interest of the students and their communities.

I can agree that there are some bad apples in terms of staff and administrators throughout the entire NYC school system, but does this justify a school closing? Or is this a short term solution for the city to qualify for federal grants? There so many issues and debates over current issues with the NYC Department of Education and how Mayor Bloomberg has handled the department during his tenure. The questions still remains, what will the school system accomplish from this move?

The NY Times article published on April 26, 2012 by Anna M. Phillips describes some of the details of what will transpire this coming school year in September 2012.






The Terrible Tales of Tenure

Teacher tenure, usually used as employment protection for teachers. Tenure is a contract which provides teachers with safety from getting fired due to reasons associating with their abilities to teach. Earning the teacher tenure can take as little as three years. Professors are reviewed only about 5 years later for tenure. “A study by The New Teacher Project (TNTP) stated that 81 percent of administrators say there is a tenured teacher in their school who is performing poorly.

What is education edging on? Is it really oblivion?

Possibly so… Are teachers properly evaluated before and even during their tenure years? According to the TNTP study, less than 1% of teachers were considered unsatisfactory. But president of The Center for Education Reform, Jeanne Allen considers, that many states may have been setting the bar too low. Tenure unfortunately isn’t about the value of teaching but has been diluted to the amount of years a teacher spends teaching.

Is tenure fair to students?

Have you ever had a nightmare professor? 

One that couldn’t relate to his or her students or even more sadly, his or her own subject? Both answers are abruptly yes, don’t lie.

Well, chances are these professors are either just horrid teachers or plainly under tenure protection.

Did you know:

  • Three years is enough time to show your worth?… Me neither.
  • Tenure from K-12 is not earned, but given as long as they “stand by” they receive it in short periods of time.
  •   That sadly, tenure is scarce in the “land of teaching the public.”

Its rough at least I think, when public school teachers are often shunned and             university professors are put on pedestals especially when teaching students of younger ages is a tad tougher then throwing a syllabus at your students and calling it a form of teaching.

  • When tenured teachers commit criminal acts against students that they are often only suspended and with PAY, or PAID to quit.

Yes! It is exactly what it seems…


You tell me, but choose one of the above. 😉

Tenure makes it increasingly difficult to fire them. They’re practically like ticks. If a teacher is underperforming, its too bad you’d have to deal since the legal process is stretched out to months and can involve court ruling. Sometimes I wonder why principals have such difficult time firing a tenured teacher. But now I know- On average $250,000 would be jeopardized just to fire a teacher in new York City.


OHHH the Irony!

Teacher’s are positioned to nurture and care for their students but with the tenure grants permission them to care solely for themselves. While few teachers receive benefits think about what it does for students.